Holocaust Memorial-German Reparations

Acceptance of German reparations created a rift in the State of Israel

Letter Excerpts:


“Today I visited The Hall of Destruction on Mt. Zion and saw the signs of what the Nazi’s had done.
I cried like a baby”

— August 12, 1957


“This morning I left Haifa for Tel Aviv …in new trains built with German reparations.”
— August 26, 1957

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Bob-signature-500px.png

Chamber of the Holocaust on Mt. Zion

Opposition leader, Menachem Begin leads the popular protests against Reparations

A mass protest in Israel against accepting Reparations (“Jewish blood money”) from Germany


Jerusalem’s First Holocaust Museum

Tucked away on the slope of Mount Zion near David’s Tomb adjacent to the Old City stands the Hall of Destruction, also known as the Chamber of the Holocaust.

The outside roof of the “Hall of Destruction”, also know as the “Chamber of the Holocaust”- from Bob Jacobs’ 1957 photos

The museum was created in 1949 (prior to Yad Vashem) by thirteen Holocaust survivors who came to Israel following the Holocaust and felt a need to memorialize their loved ones who perished. The Chamber showcases unique items that are not found in Yad Vashem. For instance, on display is a jacket sewn from a Torah scroll which a Nazi officer ordered a Jewish tailor to make.

A Nazi officer forced a Jewish tailor to sew him a shirt using a Torah scroll

Of course, Yad Vashem on Mt. Herzl is now Israel’s official memorial to the victims of the Holocaust, and is Israel’s second most visited site after the Western Wall. In stark contrast to the massive Yad Vashem complex, the Holocaust Chamber is funded largely by private donations and is less known. It does not take funding from Germany while Yad Vashem annually receives more than one million euro from the German government and substantial donations from German companies like Volkswagen and Daimlier-Benz (owner of Mercedes Benz).

German Compensation

Speaking of German reparations, the August 26, 1957 letter parenthetically mentions, that the train being traveled on was “built with German reparations”. Following the establishment of the Jewish State in 1948, the Germans offered the government of Israel reparations (compensation) as an apology for the Holocaust they perpetrated on the Jewish People. This German-made train is an example of that. But many Holocaust survivors were bothered by riding on these trains – it gave them the eerie reminder of being transported to the death camps.

Train manufactured by the German company, Maschinenfabrik Esslingen
in the old Jerusalem railway station, aquired as part of the reparations agreement with Germany, 1956

Trauma & Protest

The very concept of reparations and negotiations with Germany was unacceptable to a considerable portion of the Israeli public and sparked strong public controversy. Germany was the “land of the murderers” and funds from Germany was considered “blood money”.

Led by opposition leader Menachem Begin, mass protests calling for a boycott of Germany were organized. Begin stated that the reparations were a way easing Germany’s conscience, wiping clean the genocide they committed. Besides, he claimed, such payments did not reflect on the true amount of the looted and stolen items from the Jewish People in Europe. The battle regarding the reparations became a violent demonstration, during which protesters clashed with police and threw stones at the Knesset, shattering the windows of the building.

Angry Israelis march on the Knesset in January 1952 to protest negotiations between Israel and West Germany regarding German reparations.

David’s possible changes and links

Review Aug 12 Holocaust memorials and Aug 26 German Reparations 

In the book we put Chamber of Holocaust and German repaations on one page to fit. Some of the graphic were lost, especially the “pajamas”.

Should Holocaust Remembrance and Reparations be put on separate pages right next to each other?



1952 | Begin opposes the Reparations Program
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMWuS5_-M2c&t=5s
Following the defeat of the Herut Party in the elections for the Second Knesset, receiving only eight seats, Begin announced his resignation as head of Herut. However, his friend, Yochanan Bader, did not present his resignation to the Knesset Foreman. After a month-long leave in Europe, Begin began to contact lawyers to prepare for obtaining a license practice law. A few months later it was revealed that the government, led by David Ben-Gurion, intends to sign an agreement toward getting reparations from Germany. Begin, who objected strongly, decided to return to the political arena and lead the movement to fight against the reparations.
The idea of receiving reparations sparked strong public controversy. The government asked the Knesset to approve its power to negotiate with the German government for providing reparations to Israel. Begin attacked the upcoming agreement due to problematic phrasing – the agreement was presented as a kind of a way to correct and wipe clean the genocide committed by the Germans – and because the payments did not reflected on the true amount of the looted and stolen items from the Jewish people in Europe.
On January 7th, a debate took place at the Knesset, which was then located on King George Street in Jerusalem. Before the hearings started, Begin gave a heated speech at a mass rally in Zion Square nearby, and then returned to the Knesset, where he was the target of repeated insults from Ben-Gurion. Begin retorted with harsh words of his own, and when he refused to retract them, he has been banned for three months from the plenum. The battle regarding the reparations became a violent demonstration, during which protesters clashed with police and threw stones at the Knesset, shattering the windows of the building.


The opposition to reparations among Israelis was rooted in their belief that it would be blood money, given that Jews were the ones who had endured such atrocities. Menachem Begin, future Israeli prime minister, was one of those who jointly opposed reparations with West Germany in 1951. His arguments against it are still worth noting today: “You want to erase what happened from the memory of mankind? Wipe out history? Wipe out memory?”